Nova Health
NOVA HEALTHHome nursing and physiotherapy
Speech therapy

Advantages of Home Speech Therapy

Many families have met a similar situation. In the therapy room the patient manages the exercises asked of them, but once back at home, in real conversation and at the dining table, the patient cannot use them. The success of speech and swallowing therapy often does not depend on performance in the therapy room. It depends on whether skills can be generalised to daily life at home. This article looks at how home speech therapy gains from generalisation, and at swallowing safety at home, immediate involvement of family members, and the practical differences between home and clinic speech therapy.

How home speech therapy helps patients apply what they have learned to daily life

Extending the skills learned in speech therapy from practice in the session into everyday communication does not happen naturally. Like direct training, it has to be designed and evaluated deliberately (Mayer et al., 2024). Home therapy brings together the places of learning and of real use, and can directly help the patient turn skills “learned” in the session into skills “used” in daily life.

In short, the core value of home therapy is to put training back where the skills are finally used, which is the patient's own living room, kitchen and dining table. When the place of learning is the place of use, the skills learned more easily take root in daily life.

What generalisation is, and how it affects the results of treatment

Generalisation is an important concept in speech therapy. It refers to whether an ability learned in the therapy room extends to words, communication partners and settings that were not trained. It is at the heart of making therapy useful in practice, but it is often wrongly assumed to appear naturally.

What generalisation isGeneralisation means applying the skills learned in training to real everyday conversation, partners and settings, for example moving from practising with picture cards with the therapist to chatting with a grandchild.
Why it is at the heart of therapyGeneralisation is the core goal of aphasia therapy. If the results of treatment cannot be carried into daily life, it is hard for the benefit to show up in actual communication (Mayer et al., 2024).
It does not happen automaticallyResearch indicates that extending training results into everyday communication must be designed and evaluated deliberately, like direct training, and cannot be left to take its course (Mayer et al., 2024).
Relation to the effect of treatmentSpeech therapy can clearly improve patients' functional communication (Brady et al., 2016), but whether these gains can really be used in life depends on whether the skills generalise to the everyday environment.

The scientific basis for speech therapy in a familiar environment

Since generalisation needs to be arranged deliberately, the most direct approach is to train in the setting where the skills are actually used. Home is where the patient is really “tested” every day: talking with family, eating at the table, answering the phone. When training moves into the home, there is no longer a gap between learning and use.

Benefits of training in the home environment

  • The place of learning is the place of everyday use, so the patient does not have to adjust to a new setting again
  • Practice can use the familiar people, things and communication partners around the patient directly
  • Swallowing can be practised at the home dining table, using the utensils and food the patient normally uses
  • It reduces the gap of “able to do it in the therapy room, unable to do it once back home”

Clinical evidence for home practice

  • Generalisation does not happen automatically and must be designed and evaluated deliberately (Mayer et al., 2024)
  • Treatment tailored to the patient's function and with set home practice gives the best results (RELEASE Collaborators, 2022)
  • The home visit model lets the set practice fit naturally into the patient's daily routine

Data on the effect of tailored training and home practice

This point has large-scale evidence behind it. An individual participant data network meta-analysis of speech therapy for aphasia showed that the programme giving the best language recovery combines “a mix of receptive and expressive work, tailored to function, with prescribed home practice”. The largest gains in overall language ability were generally linked to a cumulative 20–50 hours of therapy (RELEASE Collaborators, 2022).

Overall language +18.37 points
Tailoring to function with home practice gives the best effect
95% CI 10.58–26.16 (WAB-AQ); 959 people, 25 trials (RELEASE Collaborators, 2022)
SMD 0.28
Functional communication with speech therapy compared with no therapy
95% CI 0.06–0.49; covering 27 randomised comparisons and 1,620 people with aphasia (Brady et al., 2016)
20–50 total therapy hours
Hours of training linked to the biggest gain in overall language ability
Patients of working age suit moderate to high intensity training, that is 3–4 hours of functional communication training a week (RELEASE Collaborators, 2022)

The dose and intensity of training have to be adjusted to the individual, and the flexibility of home therapy suits this well. It can fit in with the times when the patient is at their best, and build up hours steadily over the long term, so that prescribed practice fits naturally into every day.

Putting swallowing safety into practice at the everyday dining table

For patients with swallowing difficulty the idea of generalisation is just as important, and it bears directly on safety. Whether swallowing compensation strategies and texture modification are safe finally depends on whether every meal at home is carried out accurately. A successful demonstration once in the clinic does not mean that every meal at home will be safe.

Difficulties in carrying out swallowing safety advice at everyday meals

  • An observational study of eating safety in care homes found that fixed recommendations such as food texture, sitting position and alertness were met as much as 90% of the time
  • However, steps that must be carried out continuously, such as “alternating food and drink, giving prompts, and making sure each mouthful is swallowed before the next”, were met less than 60% of the time (Griffin et al., 2024)
  • Drinks thickened with thickening powder often did not match the thickness level required by IDDSI (Griffin et al., 2024)
  • A therapist who visits and demonstrates and supervises one to one with the home's own utensils and food can improve exactly these problems in carrying out advice

Three factors that affect how swallowing safety advice is carried out at home

Whether dietary advice for swallowing works depends mainly on adherence, which is shaped by three interacting levels (Nagshabandi et al., 2023). A home visit lets the therapist work on all three directly, and not rely on handing out an instruction sheet.

Personal levelFirst is the patient's own understanding and acceptance of the dietary advice and ability to carry it out. A visiting therapist can adjust and demonstrate straight away according to the patient's response on the spot.
Carer levelSecond is the carer's knowledge of the dietary advice and confidence in it, which often affects whether daily execution succeeds. The therapist can guide the carer in person at the home dining table (Nagshabandi et al., 2023).
Environment and system levelThird are the food, utensils and cooking steps at home. The therapist can help to check whether food matches the IDDSI level, improve meal preparation, and add the on-the-spot supervision that is hardest to provide in daily life (Griffin et al., 2024).

Specific steps to carry out safe eating at home

Behavioural swallowing therapy (which includes compensation strategies, safe eating advice and texture modification) has evidence in patients with swallowing difficulty after acute stroke. Compared with usual care, it greatly lowered the risk of chest infection (risk ratio 0.56, 95% CI 0.4–0.8) and raised the rate of return to a normal diet within six months (Carnaby et al., 2006). When carried out at home, the therapist demonstrates and supervises the steps below.

  1. 1
    Check the level of food and drinks
    Following the IDDSI standard, check whether the food texture and the drink thickness at home match the level set, and correct the common problem of not being thick enough.
  2. 2
    Adjust eating position and surroundings
    Make sure the patient's sitting position, alertness and eating environment are suitable for eating, and reduce distraction and the chance of choking.
  3. 3
    Demonstrate compensation strategies
    While the patient is actually eating, demonstrate safe eating techniques, such as slowing down the pace of eating and alternating food and drink.
  4. 4
    Put prompting and swallow checks into practice
    For the two steps that are hardest to do consistently, giving prompts and making sure each mouthful is swallowed before the next, the therapist supervises on site and lets the carer practise on the spot.
  5. 5
    Hand over to the carer to repeat
    The carer feeds the patient through a whole meal once in front of the therapist, to make sure every meal afterwards can be done safely in the same way, and not only when the therapist is demonstrating.

How family members take part in treatment and build practice into daily conversation

The therapist visits for only a few hours a week, so who supports the patient the rest of the time? The “dose” of training needed in speech rehabilitation is far more than the hours a therapist is present. A big benefit of home therapy is that it lets the therapist train family members on the spot, in real conversation, to become effective “communication partners”, turning the countless family interactions of every day into actual practice.

The benefit of communication partner training is well supported: all 25 studies included in the latest systematic review reported positive effects (Simmons-Mackie et al., 2016). A visiting therapist teaches family members these things on the spot.

  • Demonstrating skills in real conversation—The therapist guides on the spot from the actual conversation taking place, so that family members see for themselves how to slow down their speech, give the patient time to respond and check understanding, instead of relying only on abstract explanation.
  • Turning home interaction into practice—Everyday chatting, eating and watching television can all become practice with a purpose. Even after the therapist has left, the patient's practice hours can keep building up (RELEASE Collaborators, 2022).
  • Answers and corrections straight away—If family members have questions, they can ask the therapist on the spot and be corrected, which avoids using the wrong method for a long time.
  • Building lasting support—After communication partner training, there are positive effects for both the patient and the family members themselves (Simmons-Mackie et al., 2016), and rehabilitation support can fit naturally into daily life.

Home speech therapy compared with clinic speech therapy

In comparing the two models, the focus should not be only on equipment or fees. It should be on which model better reaches the basic goal of therapy: making the skills learned useful in daily life, and making every meal safe to eat.

Home speech therapy
  • The setting of learning is the setting of use, so the distance to generalisation is the shortest
  • Swallowing safety is trained and supervised at the real dining table with the usual utensils
  • Family members are trained on the spot to be communication partners, which extends the dose of therapy (Simmons-Mackie et al., 2016)
  • It is easy to fit the patient's best times and build up enough hours of therapy over the long term (RELEASE Collaborators, 2022)
  • One to one, with attention on a single patient throughout
Clinic speech therapy
  • Full equipment, suitable when assessment with instruments is needed
  • Fees are generally lower, with no home visit surcharge
  • Training takes place in a simulated setting, and extra design is still needed for skills to generalise
  • The gap in carrying out swallowing safety at home is harder to fill on site (Griffin et al., 2024)
  • Travel there and back has to be arranged by the family

It must be stressed that the two models are not opposed. The effect of speech therapy itself has evidence behind it (Brady et al., 2016), and the choice of setting should depend on the patient's needs. If the patient urgently needs to apply skills in daily life, or every meal at home has to be made safe, the advantage of home therapy is especially clear.

Who is suited to home speech therapy

Not all patients need home therapy equally, but the groups below suit it especially, because they most need to bring their rehabilitation progress directly into daily life, or to stay at home and keep building up enough training.

Types of patient suited to home speech therapy

  • People with aphasia: they need to apply the communication skills they learn to everyday conversation with family (Brady et al., 2016)
  • People with swallowing difficulty: they need every meal to be eaten safely at the home dining table
  • People with limited mobility, frailty or who are bedbound for long periods: going to and from a clinic is difficult
  • People with dementia: they tend to perform more steadily in the familiar home environment

Why the home visit model suits these patients

  • Rehabilitation services can be provided in the community and at home, which fits the individual's needs better (World Health Organization)
  • Family members can take part on the spot and receive communication partner training at the same time
  • It is easy to fit sessions to the time when the patient is most alert, which helps to build up enough hours of therapy over the long term (Brady et al., 2016)
  • The skills, utensils and setting used in training match the patient's real life completely

Other factors to consider in choosing a service (fees, equipment, district)

Home therapy has clear advantages, but there are some practical factors to weigh. Home visit fees are generally higher than clinic fees, some instrumental assessments can only be done in a clinic, and remote districts or bad weather may affect the journey. A better approach is to combine home therapy with follow-up by video, adjusting the dose and intensity of training to the patient, and putting resources where they are most effective.

The ideal number of hours and intensity of speech therapy should be adjusted to the individual patient. Patients of working age make more progress with moderate to high intensity training (3–4 hours of functional communication a week), and the largest gain in overall language ability is usually linked to completing a cumulative 20–50 hours of training. This supports a model of treatment that varies from person to person and can build up hours steadily at home (RELEASE Collaborators, 2022).

Checklist of key points for a home speech therapy plan

A speech therapy plan that really makes use of the strengths of the home should have the features below. You can use them to review the present or planned arrangement of therapy.

An ideal home speech therapy plan includes the following points:
  • It deliberately designs and evaluates progress in generalisation, and does not assume that the patient will use skills in life automatically once they are learned (Mayer et al., 2024)
  • It trains in real conversation and mealtime settings, so that the place of learning is the place of everyday use
  • It gives set home practice tailored to the patient's function (RELEASE Collaborators, 2022)
  • It checks the IDDSI level with the home's actual utensils and food, and supervises how each meal is carried out (Griffin et al., 2024)
  • It teaches family members on the spot to become communication partners, who carry on training hours in daily life (Simmons-Mackie et al., 2016)
  • It adjusts the hours and intensity of training to the patient's situation, building up therapy time steadily over the long term (RELEASE Collaborators, 2022)

Frequently asked questions

Is there a difference in results between home speech therapy and clinic therapy?
A systematic review found that the setting of treatment makes no significant difference to language recovery, which means that receiving therapy at home does not weaken its effect. The real strength of home therapy is generalisation. Training takes place directly in real conversation and at the dining table, so the patient finds it easier to bring the skills into daily life. An individual participant data analysis also found that results are best when the programme is “tailored to function and comes with home practice”.
The patient can do it in the clinic but cannot do it at home. What is the problem?
This is a common sign of too little generalisation. Research stresses that extending the results of trained tasks into everyday communication does not happen automatically, and needs to be designed and measured deliberately. Training at home brings the place of learning and the place of use together, and directly shortens the distance between “learning it” and “using it”.
Is swallowing therapy at home really safer?
Whether swallowing is safe depends on whether every meal is carried out accurately. An observational study in care homes showed that the hardest steps to put into practice, such as “giving prompts” and “checking the food has been swallowed”, were achieved less than 60% of the time. A visiting therapist can demonstrate and supervise one to one, directly with the patient's own utensils and the actual food, and guide the carer on the spot, filling the gap in adherence.
The therapist comes for only a few hours a week. What about the rest of the time?
The “dose” of training needed to improve speech and language is far more than the time a therapist is present. Home therapy lets the therapist train family members on the spot, in real conversation, to become “communication partners”. The latest systematic review, covering 25 studies, consistently confirmed that communication partner training has positive effects on both patients and family members, and can turn everyday family interaction into effective practice.
How long and how often does speech therapy need to be done to work?
Evidence shows that the biggest improvement in overall language ability is generally linked to a cumulative 20–50 hours of therapy, and the exact arrangement should differ from person to person. For example, people of working age are better suited to moderate to high intensity training (about 3–4 hours a week of functional communication). Home therapy can easily fit in with the time of day when the patient is most alert, which helps to build up hours steadily over the long term, with home practice to consolidate the gains.
Do swallowing compensation strategies and texture-modified food really help at home?
Yes. A randomised controlled trial in acute stroke showed that, compared with usual care, behavioural swallowing therapy (including compensation strategies, safe eating advice and texture modification) greatly lowered the risk of chest infection (risk ratio 0.56) and raised the rate of return to a normal diet. Preparing meals and drinks properly at home to the IDDSI standard, with the therapist checking the level, is the key to carrying this out safely.

To make full use of the advantages of home speech therapy, it often has to be combined with specific specialist services. You can also read more about therapy for swallowing difficulty and how it handles eating problems safely, therapy for language disorders and how it deals with aphasia and communication difficulty, and carer support and how it trains family members to be capable communication and home training partners.

Would you like the results of therapy to be really usable in daily life, and every meal at home to be safe? Our registered speech therapists can visit to assess and tailor a home therapy and home practice plan for you.

Book a home speech therapy assessment

Disclaimer: This article is general health information and is not professional medical advice. If you have any health concerns, please consult a qualified healthcare professional.

References

  1. Brady, M. C., Kelly, H., Godwin, J., Enderby, P., & Campbell, P. (2016). Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (6), CD000425. PubMed
  2. RELEASE Collaborators (Brady, M. C., et al.). (2022). Dosage, Intensity, and Frequency of Language Therapy for Aphasia: A Systematic Review–Based, Individual Participant Data Network Meta-Analysis. Stroke, 53(3), 956–967. PubMed
  3. RELEASE Collaborators (Brady, M. C., et al.). (2022). Precision rehabilitation for aphasia by patient age, sex, aphasia severity, and time since stroke? A prespecified, systematic review-based, individual participant data, network, subgroup meta-analysis. International Journal of Stroke, 17(10), 1067–1077. PubMed
  4. Mayer, J. F., Murray, L. L., Hula, W. D., et al. (2024). Generalization in Aphasia Treatment: A Tutorial for Speech-Language Pathologists. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 33(1), 540–560. PubMed
  5. Simmons-Mackie, N., Raymer, A., & Cherney, L. R. (2016). Communication Partner Training in Aphasia: An Updated Systematic Review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 97(12), 2202–2221.e8. PubMed
  6. Griffin, S., Smith, C., & Bryant, V. (2024). Supporting safe swallowing of care home residents with dysphagia: How does the care delivered compare with guidance from speech and language therapists? International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 59(3), 1023–1037. PubMed
  7. Nagshabandi, E., Namasivayam-MacDonald, A., & Riquelme, L. F. (2023). A Review of Factors Contributing to Adults' Adherence to Dysphagia Dietary Recommendations Through an Ecological Lens. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 32(2), 758–775. PubMed
  8. Carnaby, G., Hankey, G. J., & Pizzi, J. (2006). Behavioural intervention for dysphagia in acute stroke: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurology, 5(1), 31–37. PubMed
  9. International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative (IDDSI). (2019). The IDDSI Framework (international standard for food textures and drink thickness, levels 0–7). IDDSI
  10. World Health Organization. (2024). Rehabilitation (rehabilitation should be person-centred and can be provided in community and home settings). WHO Fact Sheet. who.int