Nova Health
NOVA HEALTHHome nursing and physiotherapy
Home speech therapy

Nasogastric Tube Removal (Speech Therapy)

When a family member has had a stroke or surgery, or has a neurological condition, families most often ask: "Does the nasogastric tube have to stay in for life?" In fact most patients do not need to keep the tube permanently. A nasogastric tube (NG tube) is a temporary measure for the acute phase and is not a long-term plan. A speech therapist uses a systematic swallowing assessment to judge when the patient is ready to eat safely by mouth. The decision follows set criteria and procedures backed by research, and is not a matter of waiting to see how things go. This article explains the reasons for placing the tube, the risks of leaving it in long term, the three levels of assessment, the criteria for removal and the staged plan for returning to oral feeding, so that families understand each step.

Why is a nasogastric tube needed?

Clinically, a nasogastric tube is placed when swallowing is impaired, for example after an acute stroke, a head injury, weakness after severe pneumonia or surgery to the head and neck, and the patient cannot temporarily take in enough nutrition and fluid safely by mouth. Its purpose is to maintain calories and medication during the transition period, so that the patient does not become dehydrated or get worse during the acute phase.

A nasogastric tube is a bridge and not the end point. Once an assessment confirms that the patient's swallowing has recovered to a safe range, removing the tube and returning to eating by mouth is the aim of the medical team and also the wish of the patient and family. The focus is therefore never on whether the tube can be removed, but on when and how to remove it safely.

Acute strokeDamage to the brainstem or cerebral cortex affects the control of swallowing, and more than half of patients with an acute stroke have some degree of swallowing difficulty. As nerve function recovers over weeks to months, the swallowing ability of most people improves.
Head injury, impaired consciousnessWhen the patient is not awake enough to eat safely by mouth, nutrition has to be given through the nasogastric tube. As consciousness improves, swallowing ability usually recovers as well.
After surgery or radiotherapy to the head and neckSurgery or radiotherapy to the head and neck changes the structure of the mouth, throat or oesophagus. After the operation or the course of treatment, a speech therapist needs to reassess the patient and help find a safe way to eat.
Severe pneumonia or weakness after ICULong periods in bed or with a breathing tube weaken muscles throughout the body, including the swallowing muscles. These patients need step-by-step rehabilitation training before they can eat safely by mouth again.

Risks of leaving a nasogastric tube in for a long time

Many families believe that having a tube in is the safest option, but leaving a nasogastric tube in for a long time carries several risks and can slow the recovery of swallowing. Research found that even with a nasogastric tube in place, the rate of pneumonia in patients with acute stroke was still as high as 44%, which shows that a nasogastric tube is not a reliable barrier against aspiration pneumonia (Dziewas 2004).

Effects on the nose and digestive tract

  • The tube rubs the inside of the nose over a long time and causes pressure injury and ulcers of the nasal lining
  • The tube blocks the drainage of sinus secretions, which makes acute or chronic sinusitis more likely
  • Drainage from the Eustachian tube is blocked, which makes middle ear infection more likely
  • It irritates the oesophagus and stomach and may cause stomach acid and food to flow back

Infection and lung risks

  • Having a nasogastric tube in does not mean the patient cannot get pneumonia, and the patient is still at risk of aspiration pneumonia (Dziewas 2004)
  • Secretions from the mouth and throat may run down along the tube and increase the chance of entering the airway
  • The patient may pull the tube out, or the tube may move out of place, which is dangerous
  • Not eating by mouth for a long time changes the balance of bacteria in the mouth, so pneumonia becomes more likely if the patient inhales saliva

Decline in swallowing function

  • Without eating by mouth for a long time, the swallowing muscles weaken from lack of exercise and stimulation
  • The patient may feel that the tube feeds them anyway and may be unwilling to practise swallowing
  • Without food stimulating the mouth and throat for a long time, the swallowing reflex becomes slower

Effects on mood and quality of life

  • The patient cannot sit down to eat with the family, which means less enjoyment and less time together
  • Older people with a tube can easily feel low in mood and may even refuse rehabilitation training
  • Cleaning the tube, changing the tape and watching that the patient does not pull the tube out every day adds to the carer's burden

Research also shows that stroke patients who depend on nasogastric tube feeding stay longer in hospital, have poorer functional outcomes and have a higher death rate (Schwarz 2018). Assessing as early as possible whether the tube can be removed is therefore a consensus across medical specialties, and is not a hasty step.

The speech therapist's three swallowing assessment methods

The key to deciding whether the tube can be removed is confirming that swallowing is safe. The speech therapist uses three levels of assessment. It starts with basic clinical observation at the bedside and moves up to instrument-based tests as the patient needs, choosing the method that best fits the condition.

  1. 1
    Level 1: Clinical Bedside Swallowing Assessment
    The therapist first looks at the patient's alertness, attention and ability to follow instructions, then checks the strength and coordination of the lips, tongue, cheeks, soft palate and throat muscles and tests whether the cough reflex is strong enough. The therapist then gives the patient trial amounts of foods and liquids of different textures (for example 3–5 ml of iced water and pureed food) and observes the swallowing response, looking for signs such as coughing or choking, a wet voice or a drop in blood oxygen saturation. For most patients the bedside assessment is enough to judge whether the tube can be removed.
  2. 2
    Level 2: FEES, Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing
    This test is done by a speech therapist or an ear, nose and throat doctor. A thin flexible endoscope is passed through the nose into the throat, so that the structure of the throat, vocal cord movement, any food left behind and any food going into the airway can be seen directly before and after the swallow. FEES involves no radiation and can be done at the bedside. It suits patients in whom silent aspiration is suspected but cannot be confirmed by bedside observation alone. A systematic review showed that FEES had higher sensitivity than VFSS for detecting aspiration (0.88) and penetration (0.97) (Giraldo-Cadavid 2017).
  3. 3
    Level 3: VFSS, Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study
    This test is commonly called a swallowing X-ray study. The patient eats food mixed with contrast, and a radiologist and speech therapist watch the whole journey of the food from the mouth through the throat to the entrance of the oesophagus on moving X-ray images. VFSS shows every stage of the swallow in detail and suits more complex cases, but the patient has to be able to go to the radiology department and understand instructions well enough to cooperate with the test.
0.88
Sensitivity of FEES for detecting aspiration
vs VFSS 0.77 (p=.03) (Giraldo-Cadavid 2017)
0.97
Sensitivity of FEES for detecting penetration
vs VFSS 0.83 (p=.0002) (Giraldo-Cadavid 2017)
78%
Rate of successful tube removal in stroke patients at 4 weeks
232 stroke patients with swallowing difficulty (Li 2023)

Conditions for judging whether the tube can be removed

Whether the tube can be removed successfully does not depend on one single indicator. Several conditions have to be met at the same time. The following are the criteria that speech therapists commonly check during a clinical assessment:

Checklist before removing the tube
  • Level of consciousness: the patient stays awake, can concentrate, and understands and carries out simple instructions
  • Mouth muscle function: the lips can close fully, the tongue moves freely, and the patient can make a swallowing movement on their own
  • Cough reflex: the patient has enough strength to cough, so that anything entering the airway by mistake can be coughed out
  • Passes the water swallow test: under supervision, the patient drinks 3–5 ml of iced water with no coughing or choking, no drop in blood oxygen saturation and no wet voice
  • Passes staged trial feeding: trial water, pureed food and then soft solid food in order, with no sign of food entering the airway at any stage
  • Stamina and sitting posture: the patient has enough stamina to sit upright through a meal and is not so tired that swallowing safety is affected
  • Cognition and cooperation: even with a slight decline in cognition, the patient can follow the pace of feeding and does not refuse food or swallow too fast
  • Situations in which removal should wait: if the voice becomes wet, there are signs of silent aspiration, or blood oxygen saturation keeps dropping, removal should be postponed

Research found that important predictors of whether a nasogastric tube can be removed include functional status on admission (Barthel Index), the ability to close the lips, the cognitive ability to answer simple questions, and the level of function before the stroke (Lee 2021). Another study found that younger age, clearer improvement in motor function and recovery of language ability were each independent predictors of successful removal at 4 weeks (Li 2023).

Returning to oral feeding in stages according to IDDSI

Passing the assessment and having the tube removed does not mean the patient can go straight back to a regular diet. For safety the patient must return to eating in stages. The International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative (IDDSI) divides food textures into 8 standard levels (0–7), which gives a clear and objective basis for the progress of feeding.

IDDSI 0–1 (thin liquids)This is the starting stage of the assessment. The therapist first gives a trial of 3–5 ml of iced water, and once this is shown to be safe, gradually increases to drinking 30 ml and 60 ml of water in a row. Only when no water goes into the airway during this time can the patient move to the next stage.
IDDSI 3–4 (pureed food)This food has a texture like pudding or smooth pureed meals. When swallowing this kind of food, the throat can sense the position of the food more easily and the risk of it entering the airway is lower, so it suits the start of returning to eating. Exercises such as the effortful swallow are practised at the same time.
IDDSI 5–6 (soft, minced food)This food is like well-cooked vegetables, steamed fish or thick congee, and needs more chewing and coordination in the mouth. Once the patient is shown to eat food at this level safely, a transitional arrangement can be considered, for example eating by mouth during the day and keeping the nasogastric tube at night for extra nutrition.
IDDSI 7 (regular diet)This is the final goal of returning to eating. Depending on the original condition and the speed of recovery of swallowing, some patients take several weeks to several months to eat regular meals again, and some need food of a particular texture for the long term.

The speed of return to eating differs from person to person. In patients with an acute stroke, swallowing may improve within days to weeks, but after a brainstem stroke or in severe dementia progress may be very slow or may stop. The speech therapist decides when to change the food texture according to the result of each assessment. Family members must not skip the assessment and give the patient food that is harder to swallow on their own, because this can cause aspiration pneumonia.

A nasogastric tube does not fully prevent aspiration pneumonia

Many families think that a nasogastric tube makes everything safe. This is a common misunderstanding. Research has shown clearly that:

Common misunderstanding: a tube means protection
  • A prospective study found that the pneumonia rate in acute stroke patients fed by nasogastric tube was still as high as 44% (Dziewas 2004)
  • A study of 147 patients with swallowing difficulty showed no significant difference in the aspiration severity score with or without a tube (p = .50) (Kim 2018)
  • The tube itself becomes a path for oropharyngeal secretions to run down the outside of the tube, which increases the chance of micro-aspiration
  • Leaving the tube in for a long time means the patient does not clean the mouth, bacteria build up in the mouth, and the consequences are more serious once aspiration happens
Correct understanding: assessment and training give the protection
  • A systematic swallowing assessment finds silent aspiration, so that the decision to remove the tube rests on evidence and not on guesswork
  • Swallowing training (effortful swallow, head lift exercise, EMST) strengthens the swallowing muscles and lowers the risk of aspiration
  • Systematic mouth care reduces disease-causing bacteria in the mouth, so that even if a small amount is inhaled, the chance of pneumonia is lower
  • Correct feeding posture and technique together with texture modification are a workable safeguard for safe eating

Points for carers helping the patient return to eating at home

Returning to eating successfully depends on carrying the hospital ward's standard of care into every meal at home. Carers do more than feed the patient. They carry out the therapist's plan at the dining table every day and act as the first-line observers.

  • Prepare the environment—Before feeding, check that the patient is awake and sitting upright at about 90 degrees. Turn off the television during meals to avoid distraction, and prepare food at the IDDSI level set by the therapist without changing the texture on your own.
  • Feeding technique—Give only small mouthfuls each time (about one teaspoon) and feed slowly, and make sure the previous mouthful is fully swallowed before giving the next. During feeding, watch whether the Adam's apple lifts, and watch for coughing, a wet voice or an unusual colour in the face. Do not rush the patient.
  • Care after eating—After every meal, clean the patient's mouth straight away (brush the teeth or wipe with a mouth swab) and remove food residue to reduce bacterial growth. Keep the patient sitting upright for 20–30 minutes after the meal before lying down, to prevent food flowing back into the airway.
  • Swallowing exercises—Each day, practise the swallowing exercises at home with the patient as taught by the therapist, for example the effortful swallow, head and neck movements or expiratory muscle strength training. The swallowing muscles improve only with regular exercise, and doing the exercises only now and then gives much poorer results.
  • Warning signs—After eating, if the patient's voice becomes "wet", there is repeated coughing or choking, blood oxygen saturation drops, or there is an unexplained fever or fast breathing, stop oral feeding at once and contact the speech therapist or doctor for reassessment.

Frequently asked questions

Once a nasogastric tube is in, does it have to stay in for the long term?
No, not necessarily. A nasogastric tube is a temporary arrangement for the acute phase, meant to maintain nutrition while the patient cannot eat safely by mouth. Once a speech therapy assessment confirms that swallowing has improved enough and the criteria for removal are met, the tube should be removed as early as possible. Leaving the tube in for a long time carries risks such as sinusitis, pressure injury of the nasal lining, acid reflux and pneumonia, and it also reduces the patient's willingness to practise swallowing. Research shows that about 70 to 80% of stroke patients can have the tube removed successfully after four weeks of rehabilitation training.
Who decides when the tube can be removed, the doctor or the speech therapist?
The decision is usually made together by a multidisciplinary team, and the speech therapist carries out the core swallowing assessment. The therapist uses a clinical bedside assessment and observation of trial feeding, and where needed adds instrument-based tests such as FEES (flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing) or VFSS (videofluoroscopic swallowing study), to judge whether the patient is ready to eat safely by mouth. The doctor takes into account overall medical factors such as level of consciousness, metabolic indicators and the condition of the lungs. If a home assessment is arranged, the speech therapist also gives the family and the attending doctor a written report to help with the decision.
What does a swallowing assessment involve? Is FEES or an X-ray study needed?
The assessment has three levels. The first is the Clinical Bedside Swallowing Assessment, which checks the patient's alertness, the function of the mouth muscles and the cough reflex, and observes the swallowing response to trial water, pureed food and soft solid food. In most cases the bedside assessment alone gives enough information. FEES (direct viewing of the swallow in the throat with a flexible endoscope) or VFSS (an X-ray recording of the whole swallow) is needed only when silent aspiration is suspected or the case is more complex. Research found that FEES was slightly better than VFSS for detecting aspiration (sensitivity 0.88) and penetration (0.97) (Giraldo-Cadavid 2017).
Can the patient go back to normal eating straight after the assessment?
After the tube is removed the patient usually cannot go straight back to a normal diet. The diet moves forward step by step according to the IDDSI texture levels. It usually starts with thin liquids or iced water (IDDSI 0–1), moves on to pureed food (IDDSI 4) and soft, minced food (IDDSI 6), and finally returns to a regular diet (IDDSI 7), depending on progress. Before each step up, the speech therapist reassesses to make sure swallowing is safe before the patient moves to the next stage. Depending on the underlying condition and how the swallowing muscles recover, some patients need from several weeks to several months to complete the process.
How can the family help at home after the tube is removed? What can carers do?
The carer's help in daily life is very important for returning to oral feeding. Before each feed, check that the patient is awake, sitting upright at about 90 degrees and in a quiet environment, and prepare food strictly at the IDDSI texture set by the speech therapist. During feeding, give small mouthfuls slowly and make sure the previous mouthful is fully swallowed before giving the next. After the meal, help clean the mouth, and watch for a "wet" voice, coughing or choking, or an unusual colour in the face. Each day, help the patient do the swallowing exercises as taught by the therapist (for example effortful swallow and the head lift exercise) to keep up the training. If fever, repeated coughing or choking, or abnormal breathing appears, stop oral feeding at once and seek medical help.

For the full framework of swallowing assessment and for other speech and communication difficulties, see our pages on home speech therapy.

Worried that a family member's nasogastric tube is hard to remove? Our speech therapists can visit your home for a systematic swallowing assessment, judge the timing of tube removal, set an individual staged plan for returning to oral feeding, and demonstrate swallowing exercises that can be continued at home. Message us on WhatsApp for a quick reply, usually within 1 hour.

Free home speech therapy consultation

Disclaimer: This article is general health information and is not professional medical advice. If you have any health concerns, please consult a qualified healthcare professional.

References

  1. Dziewas, R., Ritter, M., Schilling, M., et al. (2004). Pneumonia in acute stroke patients fed by nasogastric tube. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 75(6), 852–856. PubMed
  2. Kim, G., Baek, S., Park, H. W., Kang, E. K., & Lee, G. (2018). Effect of nasogastric tube on aspiration risk: results from 147 patients with dysphagia and literature review. Dysphagia, 33(6), 731–738. PubMed
  3. Giraldo-Cadavid, L. F., Leal-Leaño, L. R., Leon-Basantes, G. A., et al. (2017). Accuracy of endoscopic and videofluoroscopic evaluations of swallowing for oropharyngeal dysphagia. Laryngoscope, 127(9), 2002–2010. PubMed
  4. Lee, K. C., Liu, C. T., Tzeng, I. S., & Chie, W. C. (2021). Predictors of nasogastric tube removal in patients with stroke and dysphagia. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 44(3), 205–208. PubMed
  5. Li, B., Zhang, T., Zhao, J., et al. (2023). Can non-swallowing function assessment predict nasogastric tube removal in patients with poststroke dysphagia? A clinical study. Frontiers in Neurology, 13, 984707. PubMed
  6. Schwarz, M., Coccetti, A., Murdoch, A., & Cardell, E. (2018). The impact of aspiration pneumonia and nasogastric feeding on clinical outcomes in stroke patients: a retrospective cohort study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(1–2), e235–e241. PubMed