Nova Health
NOVA HEALTHHome nursing and physiotherapy
Speech therapy for Parkinson's disease

Can the EMST Swallowing Exercise (Expiratory Muscle Strength Training) Improve Swallowing Safety in Parkinson's Disease?

Our article on swallowing difficulty and choking in Parkinson's disease explains that expiratory muscle strength training (EMST) is the swallowing exercise with the most research support. After reading it, many families ask whether this training really improves swallowing safety, how large the effect is, and whether buying a device and practising at home is an option. This page looks at the therapy in detail. It starts from the key randomised controlled trial and then covers how it works, how much training is used, how long the benefit lasts, its limits, and the reminders from a new study in 2023.

The conclusion first: for protecting swallowing and cough function in Parkinson's disease, EMST is the single exercise therapy with the most research support. It is a supplementary treatment that aims to improve the problem and does not cure it, and a speech therapist (ST) must assess the patient and prescribe it beforehand. The details follow, and every figure is referenced.

Important: EMST is not something to start by buying a device and blowing into it at home.Setting the breathing resistance, judging whether the patient's cognition and lung function allow the training, and finding out whether swallowing or cough is the weaker part all need to be assessed and decided by a speech therapist with instruments first. This page explains how EMST works, what the research shows and where it falls short. It is not a guide for patients to follow on their own.

What is EMST (expiratory muscle strength training), and how does it differ from other swallowing exercises?

EMST (Expiratory Muscle Strength Training) is different from traditional mouth exercises such as moving the tongue. It uses a small device with a built-in spring, and the patient has to breathe out forcefully to open a valve. It is resistance training for the expiratory muscles (including the abdominal and intercostal muscles). It works on the same principle as weight training for other muscles and is a form of progressive resistance training.

How does breathing out relate to swallowing safety? Forceful breathing out and protecting the airway during a swallow use overlapping muscle groups and nerve pathways. These include the suprahyoid muscles, which lift the larynx up and forward to close the entrance to the airway. Training the strength of breathing out therefore also strengthens the muscles that protect the airway during a swallow. It also strengthens the voluntary cough, so that the patient has enough force to cough up anything that goes down the wrong way.

Why people with Parkinson's disease have swallowing difficulty and choking

People with Parkinson's disease have two separate but related gaps in function, and EMST tries to address both:

Gap 1: swallowing safety (dysphagia)During the swallow the larynx is not lifted strongly enough, and the entrance to the airway closes too late. Food or water then easily flows into the entrance of the larynx, or directly into the airway.
Gap 2: cough protection (dystussia)If food enters the airway, the patient may be unable to cough it out because the expiratory muscles are weak. People with Parkinson's disease also often have silent aspiration, which means they choke without noticing. Together these two problems easily lead to aspiration pneumonia.

EMST targets two problems: too little protection during a swallow, and too little force to cough when choking. It helps to improve the swallowing movement and also builds expiratory strength, so that the patient has the force to cough out food that enters the airway.

Results of the Troche 2010 randomised controlled trial

The main evidence for this page comes from a randomised, sham-controlled trial by Troche and colleagues, published in Neurology in 2010. The control group used a sham device that looked identical but had no resistance inside. This removes the placebo effect of patients believing they were receiving treatment, and makes the study design rigorous.

60 people / 4 weeks
Participants and training in the Troche 2010 RCT: people with Parkinson's disease at Hoehn-Yahr stages 2 to 4, training 5 days a week for about 20 minutes a day
Troche et al., 2010 (PMID 21098406)
PAS average 3 → 2
After EMST training, the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) score improved by about 1 point on average, which was statistically significant. The larynx and hyoid bone also lifted higher during swallowing
Troche et al., 2010 (PMID 21098406)

Why does the fall in PAS score from 3 to 2 matter? The PAS is a scale from 1 (no penetration) to 8 (material enters the airway and cannot be coughed out). A fall from 3 to 2 broadly means that the situation improved from food entering the entrance of the larynx to food touching it slightly and being cleared straight away. This is a meaningful clinical improvement. It also confirms a point made later in this article: the result is an improvement, and it does not bring the problem down to zero.

An earlier pilot study (Pitts et al., 2009) reached a similar conclusion. In 10 people with Parkinson's disease who showed signs of penetration or aspiration, voluntary cough improved after 4 weeks of EMST and PAS scores fell significantly. This suggests EMST has a positive effect on both swallowing and cough.

How EMST works: why does breathing out against resistance improve swallowing?

The main reason that training to blow out against resistance can improve swallowing is that muscles and nerve pathways are shared:

  1. 1
    Strengthening the suprahyoid muscles
    Breathing out forcefully and protecting the airway during a swallow both use the suprahyoid muscles under the chin and at the front of the neck. Blowing against resistance trains this muscle group.
  2. 2
    Better lifting of the larynx
    When these muscles are strong, the larynx and hyoid bone lift higher and faster during a swallow. In the Troche 2010 study, X-ray imaging did show a greater lift of the larynx and hyoid bone after training.
  3. 3
    Better airway closure and cough
    When the larynx lifts high enough, the entrance to the airway closes more tightly, which reduces the chance of food entering the airway. Expiratory force is also stronger, so that the patient has enough force to cough out anything that goes the wrong way.

A 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis of 10 RCTs supports this mechanism with data. Respiratory muscle training clearly raised maximum expiratory pressure (MEP) (pooled mean difference MD = 17.08, 95% CI 2.32–31.84, p = 0.02) and also improved voluntary peak expiratory flow, but it showed no significant effect on maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) (Navas-Garrido et al., 2025). The benefit of EMST is therefore concentrated on breathing out and cough, which fits the theory of how it works.

EMST equipment, resistance settings and training schedule

For EMST to work, the resistance must be high enough, because training at too low a resistance has no effect. A standard training prescription is outlined below (for reference only; the actual resistance level must be set by an ST according to the patient's own MEP):

Resistance levelResistance is usually set at about 75% of the patient's maximum expiratory pressure (MEP), and is raised step by step as expiratory strength improves.
Daily trainingEach session lasts about 20 minutes, with repeated sets of forceful blowing to open the valve inside the device.
Frequency5 days a week.
CourseIn the Troche 2010 study the course lasted 4 weeks. After that, the speech therapist (ST) assesses the patient and decides how to arrange maintenance training.

The blowing resistance setting is very important in EMST.There is a reason for setting it at 75% of MEP. If the resistance is too low, the exercise has no training effect. If it is too high, a patient who already has heart or lung problems may feel dizzy or unwell. Each patient's MEP can only be known by measuring it with an instrument, so patients should not buy a device online and adjust the resistance on their own.

How long does the benefit last after training stops?

Whether the benefit fades quickly after training stops is a key question in clinical use. On this point the research on EMST is reassuring.

MEP fell only about 2%
3 months after training stopped, patients' maximum expiratory pressure was still about 17% higher than before training, which shows that the gain in expiratory strength can last for some time
Troche et al., 2014 (PMID 24933728)
7 of 10 people
3 months after training stopped, the improvement in swallowing safety was still maintained. This was a small follow-up study, and Parkinson's disease itself continues to progress over time
Troche et al., 2014 (PMID 24933728)

One further point should be stated plainly. The studies on how long the benefit lasts are small, and Parkinson's disease is a progressive condition, so the swallowing ability of the patient will change over time. In clinical practice an ST will usually advise that the patient has regular reassessment and, when needed, maintenance training. One course of training does not settle the problem for good.

Limits of EMST and other training methods

Three limits of the training are easy to overlook and should be stated clearly:

  • The effect of EMST is moderate. It improves swallowing difficulty and does not cure it. In the research the PAS score improved by only about 1 point on average, so the patient still has to follow the speech therapist's (ST) advice on food textures, and should not assume that any food is safe after training.
  • The certainty of the current evidence is low. A 2022 systematic review of 26 papers found that the better-designed studies mostly showed EMST helping swallowing efficiency more than swallowing safety (Gandhi & Steele, 2022).
  • EMST is not the only way to improve cough function. The speech therapist (ST) first needs to assess which part is weaker, and then choose a suitable combination of training (see the explanation below).

A finding from 2023: Troche and colleagues published a randomised controlled trial of 65 people in 2023. It found that sensorimotor cough training (smTAP), which targets the cough directly, worked better than EMST for improving the reflex cough (including peak expiratory flow, expired volume and urge to cough)(Troche et al., 2023). This means that if the patient's main problem is that the reflex cough is not triggered when choking, EMST may not be the most suitable choice. Before training, a speech therapist (ST) must therefore assess whether swallowing or cough is weaker, and whether the problem lies in voluntary cough or reflex cough, before deciding which training to use.

Another reminder comes from a study across diseases. In people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), EMST improved MEP and hyoid displacement but did not significantly change PAS scores or cough measures (Plowman et al., 2016). In other words, the benefit of EMST for swallowing safety is not the same in every neurological condition, and conclusions should be applied to other conditions with great care.

Why a speech therapist (ST) should assess first

Taking the points above together, the reasons why EMST should not be tried by trial and error at home are clear:

First confirm that the patient really has unsafe swallowingPeople with Parkinson's disease often have silent aspiration and may not know when food enters the airway. Whether the patient aspirates, and how severe it is, can only be confirmed by a speech therapist (ST) using a videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) or an endoscopic examination.
The resistance level must be individualThe blowing resistance of 75% MEP must be set from the expiratory pressure actually measured. Resistance that is too low has no effect, and resistance that is too high carries risk. It cannot be guessed.
Judging whether the patient is suitable and which training to doPeople with severe cognitive impairment or severe lung disease may not be suitable for EMST. If the patient's main problem is a weakened reflex cough, other training such as smTAP may suit better.

For families of people with Parkinson's disease who have difficulty moving, or who are at an advanced stage and cannot go out often, home visits by a speech therapist are a practical option. An ST can do a bedside swallowing assessment at home, teach safe eating strategies and, where the situation allows, guide the patient through rehabilitation exercises such as EMST. Families should be aware of one limit: a home-visit ST generally cannot do VFSS in the home. If silent aspiration is suspected, the ST may first refer the patient to a hospital for an instrument-based assessment, so that the training is safe and addresses the right problem. More information is available on our speech therapy at home page.

Frequently asked questions

Can a person with Parkinson's swallowing problems buy a breathing trainer online and practise at home?
This is strongly discouraged. EMST works only when the resistance is high enough, and the research set the training load at about 75% of maximum expiratory pressure (MEP). If the resistance is too low, the training has no effect. If it is too high, a person who already has heart or lung problems may feel dizzy or unwell. It is also more important to confirm whether the patient really has unsafe swallowing (food going into the airway) and how severe it is. This needs a detailed assessment by a speech therapist (ST) using instruments such as a videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS). The correct approach is for the ST to assess the patient and prescribe a suitable resistance level first, and then for the patient to train under guidance.
Does EMST really improve swallowing safety? How large is the effect?
There is research support, but the effect is a moderate improvement and not a cure. A randomised controlled trial published in Neurology in 2010 (60 people with Parkinson's disease, 4 weeks of training) found a statistically significant improvement in the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) score in the EMST group, and the larynx lifted higher (Troche et al., 2010). However, the group average score fell only from about 3 to 2. This means that the situation improved from food entering the entrance of the larynx to food touching it slightly and being cleared straight away. EMST can lower the risk of choking and aspiration, but it does not mean the patient can eat without restriction. Daily food textures must still follow the ST's advice.
Does the benefit fade quickly after training stops?
This is one of the better points about EMST. A follow-up study in 2014 found that 3 months after training stopped, maximum expiratory pressure fell by only about 2% and was still about 17% higher than before training. Seven of 10 people kept the improvement in swallowing safety (Troche et al., 2014). This suggests that the gain in expiratory muscle strength is fairly stable. However, the study was small, and Parkinson's disease itself progresses over time. For this reason an ST will usually advise regular reassessment and maintenance training when needed. Completing one course of training is not a permanent solution.
Is EMST suitable for every person with Parkinson's disease? Who should not do it?
It does not suit everyone. EMST requires the patient to understand instructions and to breathe out forcefully on request. A person with severe cognitive impairment, or with dementia in the middle or later stages, often cannot do the exercise accurately, and the benefit is limited. People with severe lung disease are a relative contraindication and need a detailed assessment by a doctor or ST beforehand. Most people in earlier studies were at Hoehn-Yahr stages 2 to 4 and able to cooperate to a reasonable degree. If the condition is very advanced or the patient cannot follow instructions at all, other approaches may be needed, such as changing food textures or feeding strategies. The ST makes the final decision on suitability for each patient.
Is EMST the best way to improve cough protection (prevent choking)?
It may not be the best option, but it is one of the methods with research support. Besides weaker swallowing, people with Parkinson's disease often cannot cough when they choke (a weakened cough reflex), and this is also a cause of aspiration pneumonia. EMST can strengthen the expiratory muscles and improve voluntary cough. However, a new randomised controlled trial of 65 people in 2023 found that sensorimotor cough training (smTAP), which targets the cough directly, improved the reflex cough more than EMST (Troche et al., 2023). EMST is therefore not the only way to protect cough function. The ideal approach is for an ST to assess whether swallowing or cough is weaker, and whether the problem lies in voluntary or reflex cough, and then to put together the most suitable training.
Where can this be done in Hong Kong? Can home speech therapy help?
In Hong Kong, public hospitals (Hospital Authority) and some private healthcare providers offer speech therapy for swallowing. If the patient has difficulty moving and cannot go out often, home speech therapy is a practical choice. An ST can do a bedside swallowing assessment at home, teach the family safe eating strategies and, where suitable, teach rehabilitation exercises such as EMST. A home-visit ST generally cannot do a videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) in the home. If silent aspiration is suspected, the ST may first refer the patient to a hospital for an instrument-based assessment, so that later training is safe and addresses the right problem.

Disclaimer: This article is general health information and is not professional medical advice. If you have any health concerns, please consult a qualified healthcare professional.

References

  1. Troche, M. S., Okun, M. S., Rosenbek, J. C., Musson, N., Fernandez, H. H., Rodriguez, R., Romrell, J., Pitts, T., Wheeler-Hegland, K. M., & Sapienza, C. M. (2010). Aspiration and swallowing in Parkinson disease and rehabilitation with EMST: a randomized trial. Neurology, 75(21), 1912–1919. PMID 21098406
  2. Pitts, T., Bolser, D., Rosenbek, J., Troche, M., Okun, M. S., & Sapienza, C. (2009). Impact of expiratory muscle strength training on voluntary cough and swallow function in Parkinson disease. Chest, 135(5), 1301–1308. PMID 19029430
  3. Troche, M. S., Rosenbek, J. C., Okun, M. S., & Sapienza, C. M. (2014). Detraining outcomes with expiratory muscle strength training in Parkinson disease. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 51(2), 305–310. PMID 24933728
  4. Troche, M. S., Curtis, J. A., Sevitz, J. S., Dakin, A. E., Perry, S. E., Borders, J. C., Grande, A. A., Mou, Y., Vanegas-Arroyave, N., & Hegland, K. W. (2023). Rehabilitating Cough Dysfunction in Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Movement Disorders, 38(2), 201–211. PMID 36345090
  5. Gandhi, P., & Steele, C. M. (2022). Effectiveness of Interventions for Dysphagia in Parkinson Disease: A Systematic Review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 31(1), 463–485. PMID 34890260
  6. Navas-Garrido, I., Martín-Núñez, J., Raya-Benítez, J., Granados-Santiago, M., Navas-Otero, A., López-López, L., & Valenza, M. C. (2025). Respiratory Muscle Strength Training in Parkinson's Disease—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Healthcare (Basel), 13(10), 1214. PMID 40428050
  7. Plowman, E. K., Watts, S. A., Tabor, L., Robison, R., Gaziano, J., Domer, A. S., Richter, J., Vu, T., & Gooch, C. (2016). Impact of expiratory strength training in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Muscle & Nerve, 54(1), 48–53. PMID 26599236