Choosing a Residential Care Home
The first obstacle with residential homes is not which one to choose. It is the names. The everyday term “old people's home” is not a category in the system, and a “convalescent home” belongs to the Hospital Authority's system and not the Social Welfare Department's. This page first explains how homes are actually graded and how the subsidised and private routes work, and then turns to the decision of whether or not to send the older person to a home, which many families find hard to talk about.
Home levels by level of care
Every residential care home for the elderly in Hong Kong must hold a licence from the Social Welfare Department, and homes are graded by the level of care their residents need. Understanding this grading is practical, because the level into which the older person's care needs fall decides directly what type of home the family should look for and which type of subsidised place to wait for.
| Elderly home (安老院) | This type of home suits older people with lower care needs who can mostly look after themselves. Homes of this type are becoming fewer on the market, and many have been converted into care-and-attention homes. |
| Care-and-attention home (護理安老院) | This type of home suits older people with medium to high care needs, for example those who need help with daily living, have difficulty moving around, or have a chronic illness that needs daily nursing care. Most homes on the market are at this level, and the “care-and-attention places” on the waiting list for government-subsidised services also refer to this type. |
| Nursing home (護養院) | This type of home has the highest care density. Its residents are mainly older people with heavier medical and nursing needs, for example those who are bedbound for long periods or need regular nursing procedures. This type has the fewest places and the longest waiting times. |
| Convalescent home (療養院) | This service is not part of the Social Welfare Department's classification of residential care homes. It is provided by the Hospital Authority, which runs general convalescent services and a central waiting list for convalescent services, and applications must be submitted through a referral office designated by the Social Welfare Department. Carers easily confuse this service with a nursing home, but the application routes and assessment systems of the two are different. |
Subsidised places and private homes compared
Once the family decides to look for a residential home, the next fork is the choice between a subsidised place and a private home. This is more than a question of cheap against expensive. It involves two entirely different sets of admission rules.
- Subsidised by the government, so the cost is much lower
- The standardised care need assessment for elderly services must be done first, to confirm the level of care need
- After assessment the older person is placed on the waiting list, and the wait is counted in months or even years
- Includes subsidised home places and the Enhanced Bought Place Scheme (the government buys places from private homes)
- Suits: families whose need can wait and for whom cost matters
- Approach the home directly, and admission can be within a few days
- No standardised assessment is needed
- Paid in full by the family, and fees and quality vary enormously
- Charges beyond the monthly fee (nappies, escort to appointments, medication management) are billed item by item, and this is where the real difference lies
- Suits: families who cannot wait, or who want to choose the environment themselves
In practice many families take a mixed approach. They arrange for the older person to move into a private home first to cope with the urgent need, and at the same time join the queue for a government-subsidised place through the standardised assessment, moving to the subsidised home once a place is allocated. This only works if the assessment process is started early. To find out how the assessment and waiting list work, see the standardised assessment and waiting list for elderly care services.
Factors to weigh when choosing between a home and care at home
Many families hesitate for a long time at this point, because it looks on the surface like a moral question (worry that sending the older person to a home will be seen as lacking filial duty). In fact it is a supply and demand calculation. On one side are the older person's care needs: whether someone needs to be on watch at night, how many people are needed to lift, transfer and bathe the older person, and whether the cognitive state allows being left at home alone. On the other side is the help and energy the family can actually give. The key is whether the two can be matched.
There are two common blind spots in this judgement. The first is to equate “the carer is close to being unable to carry on” directly with “the older person must move into a residential care home”. If the gap in care appears only in the daytime, or is purely short-term, day care centres and respitemay already be able to fill it, and moving into a home may not be needed. The second is to see moving into a home as all or nothing. After the older person moves in, the family's role does not disappear. It changes from worn-out day and night carer to relatives who visit and keep company, and in many families the relationship mends only after the heavy burden of physical care has been put down.
If the final decision is for the older person to stay at home, the system supports for care at home, including allowances, hiring a domestic helper or care worker, and community support services, can be found as entry points to detailed information in the overview of carer resources.
Disclaimer: This article is general health information and is not professional medical advice. If you have any health concerns, please consult a qualified healthcare professional.
